<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>Politics &amp; Religion</title><link>/Forums/tabid/643/forumid/35/scope/threads/Default.aspx</link><description>Like to argue? Well this is probably the place...</description><pubDate>2010-09-07T06:41:02Z</pubDate><lastBuildDate>2009-11-16T14:57:41Z</lastBuildDate><ttl>30</ttl><item><title>TOC Read Before You Post</title><pubDate>2009-05-19T21:38:50Z</pubDate><author>EvermoreAdmin</author><link>/Forums/tabid/643/forumid/35/threadid/34/scope/posts/Default.aspx</link><description>
In order to use these forums, users are required to provide a username, password and e-mail address. Users are responsible for their posts. Neither the Administrators of these forums, or the Moderators participating, are responsible for the privacy practices of any user. Remember that all information that is disclosed in these areas becomes public information and you should exercise caution when deciding to share any of your personal information. Any user who finds material posted by another user objectionable is encouraged to contact us via e-mail. We are authorized by you to remove or modify any data submitted by you to these forums for any reason we feel constitutes a violation of our policies, or the law, whether stated, implied or not.





This site may contain links to other web sites and files. We have no control over the content and can not ensure it will not be offensive or objectionable. We will, however, remove links to material that we feel is inappropriate as we become aware of them.





Cookies must be turned on in your browser to participate as a user in these forums. Cookies are used here to hold your username and password and viewing options, allowing you to login.





By pressing the 'Agree' button, you agree that you, the user, are 13 years of age or over. You are fully responsible for any information or file supplied by this user and Advanced Tech Knowledge is held harmless. You also agree that you will not post any copyrighted material that is not owned by yourself or the owners of these forums. In your use of these forums, you agree that you will not post any information which is vulgar, harassing, hateful, threatening, invading of others privacy, sexually oriented, or violates any laws.





In order to use these forums, users are required to provide a username, password and e-mail address. Users are responsible for their posts. Neither the Administrators of these forums, or the Moderators participating, are responsible for the privacy practices of any user. Remember that all information that is disclosed in these areas becomes public information and you should exercise caution when deciding to share any of your personal information. Any user who finds material posted by another user objectionable is encouraged to contact us via e-mail. We are authorized by you to remove or modify any data submitted by you to these forums for any reason we feel constitutes a violation of our policies, or the law, whether stated, implied or not.





This site may contain links to other web sites and files. We have no control over the content and can not ensure it will not be offensive or objectionable. We will, however, remove links to material that we feel is inappropriate as we become aware of them.





Cookies must be turned on in your browser to participate as a user in these forums. Cookies are used here to hold your username and password and viewing options, allowing you to login.





By pressing the 'Agree' button, you agree that you, the user, are 13 years of age or over. You are fully responsible for any information or file supplied by this user and Advanced Tech Knowledge is held harmless. You also agree that you will not post any copyrighted material that is not owned by yourself or the owners of these forums. In your use of these forums, you agree that you will not post any information which is vulgar, harassing, hateful, threatening, invading of others privacy, sexually oriented, or violates any laws.





The user understands: This is an independently run website and has no affiliation with either the ILWU nor the PMA. All thoughts and comments on this board are that of the author and do not necessarily represent the view or opinions of Advanced Tech Knowledge. By using this board you agree to hold Advanced Tech Knowledge harmless.





If you do agree with the rules and policies stated in this agreement, and meet the criteria stated herein, proceed to view and use the board.





These rules are subject to change, as needed to comply with the law.








If you do agree with the rules and policies stated in this agreement, and meet the criteria stated herein, proceed to press the 'Agree' button below, otherwise press 'Cancel'.





These rules are subject to change, as needed to comply with the law
</description><slash:comments>0</slash:comments></item><item><title>Clueless Summit</title><pubDate>2009-11-16T14:57:41Z</pubDate><author>RBriggs</author><link>/Forums/tabid/643/forumid/35/threadid/207/scope/posts/Default.aspx</link><description>
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=512490





&lt;font size='4'&gt;Clueless Summit&lt;/font&gt;





Posted 11/13/2009 07:54 PM ET





Economy: Next month's 'Jobs Summit' at the White House promises to feature a lot of posing and preening by Washington politicians. Unfortunately, despite lots of photo ops, it's not likely to result in many jobs.





Something's wrong when the government of the most prolific job-creating economy in history has to schedule a 'summit' to decide how to create jobs.





This isn't rocket science. Any business owner, entrepreneur or manager can tell you that job creation requires new businesses, new investment in plant and equipment, and economic policies conducive to both.





But so far, those in charge in Washington seem to be doing everything in their power to kill jobs, whether it's hiking the minimum wage, snubbing trade deals, imposing new mandates with health reforms and climate controls, or paving the way for a massive 69% increase in capital-gains tax rates by letting the Bush cuts expire.





All told, these and other initiatives, plus the higher spending that goes with them, will suck as much as $13 trillion out of our economy over the next decade.


&amp;#160;


&lt;img alt='' src='http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/sbr111309dAPR20091113103017.jpg' 





Yet Democrats are shocked — shocked! — that the unemployment rate has surged to a 26-year high of 10.2%, nearly a third higher than estimated in February. And that more than 4 million jobs have been lost this year despite $700 billion in bailouts, $787 billion in 'stimulus,' record-low interest rates of 0%, and more than $1 trillion in liquidity pumped into the banking system.





Given this record, the only real reason for a jobs summit is to appear to be 'doing something' about the labor market implosion. After all, 2010 is a midterm election year, and the Democrats' ability to continue their leftist tinkering with our once-mighty economy hinges on voters giving them another chance.





Well, they don't need a summit. Job creation closely tracks investment in plants and equipment. So anything the government does to remove barriers to business investment — whether by cutting regulations, slashing taxes or reducing government spending — will lead to more jobs.





Of particular importance are small businesses, which — as a new report from the Kauffman Foundation noted — created virtually all the new jobs from 1980 to 2005.





Today, small firms suffer the most damage from congressional incompetence. The newly passed health care bill, for example, slaps families with more than $500,000 in income with an added 5.4% tax. But, according to Congress' Joint Tax Committee, a third of this will be paid by small, family-owned businesses.





The government's fiscal insanity hurts everyone. The Congressional Budget Office reckons that government outlays will grow at least 67% over the next 10 years while public debt more than doubles to $14.3 trillion. In short, not an ideal time for entrepreneurs.





Meanwhile, as Americans in the hundreds of thousands lose their jobs each month, the government continues to siphon off badly needed investment capital, waste money to keep failed companies afloat, discourage personal savings and erect barriers to hiring.





If this continues, don't expect the 'Sorry, not hiring' signs to come down very soon — summit or no summit.
</description><slash:comments>0</slash:comments></item><item><title>Dem Vows to Block Health Care Bill</title><pubDate>2009-11-11T17:45:13Z</pubDate><author>Lunger</author><link>/Forums/tabid/643/forumid/35/threadid/193/scope/posts/Default.aspx</link><description>&lt;div class='headline'&gt;'http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/subway-series-senator-ben-nelson-abortion-amendment-health/story?id=9045075'&gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/subway-series-senator-ben-nelson-abortion-amendment-health/story?id=9045075
&lt;h1&gt;Democrat Ben Nelson Draws a Line in the Sand on Health Care&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class='dek'&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Nelson Won't Vote for Health Care Bill That Looks Like the House Version&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class='story_byline'&gt;By JONATHAN KARL


&lt;span&gt;Nov. 11, 2009&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class='story_bylinecredit'&gt;&lt;img border='0' src='http://a.abcnews.com/images/Site/byline_abcnews.gif' alt=''  					 					


'http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/subway-series-senator-ben-nelson-abortion-amendment-health/comments?type=story id=9045075'&gt; 					123 comments 					&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class='clearboth'&gt;&lt;!--empty --&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;!--
This is an example of overriding the defaults
1 url of permalink/page
2 title (escape single quotes)
3 rss location or false
4 id of story for STF and print page
5 STF available
6 show font size
--&gt;
 

In a warning sign for the White House, Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska tells ABC News &lt;a target='external' href='http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/health-care-overhaul-bipartisanship/story?id=9036085'&gt;that he'll vote to block any health care bill that looks like the bill passed by the House.

&lt;div style='width: 336px;' class='story-embed-left' id='main-media'&gt;
 
 
 
 
 
&lt;div style='display: none;'&gt;&lt;a id='atMP' href='http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php'&gt;Share&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class='main-desc'&gt;
&lt;div id='cap-short'&gt;ABC News' Jonathan Karl chats with Sen. Ben Nelson on the Capitol Hill subway.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

'Well, first of all, it has more than a robust public option, it's got a totally government-run plan, the costs are extraordinary associated with it, it increases taxes in a way that will not pass in the Senate and I could go on and on and on,' Nelson said in an interview that is part of &lt;a target='external' href='http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=8289774 page=1'&gt;ABC News' Subway Series with Jonathan Karl.


'Faced with a decision about whether or not to move a bill that is bad, I won't vote to move it,' he added. 'For sure.'


The $1.1 trillion price tag on the House bill, Nelson said, is 'absolutely' too high.

&lt;div class='relatedblock-center box story-embed-center' id='relatedblock'&gt;
&lt;div class='label'&gt;Related&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class='blocker center'&gt;'http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=8289774 page=1'&gt;&lt;img border='0' src='http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/ht_subway_series_090807_mc.jpg' alt='' 
&lt;div class='headline'&gt;'http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=8289774 page=1'&gt;Exclusive: Burris Not Ruling Out Senate Race&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class='blocker center'&gt;'http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/11/10/stung-by-setback-abortion-rights-backers-threaten-primary-chall/'&gt;&lt;img border='0' src='http://a.abcnews.com/images/US/abortion2_091109_mc.jpg' alt='' 
&lt;div class='headline'&gt;'http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/11/10/stung-by-setback-abortion-rights-backers-threaten-primary-chall/'&gt;PoliticsDaily: NARAL Considers Primary Challenges to Anti-Abortion Democrats&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class='blocker center'&gt;'http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=8951720' onkeydown='return event.keyCode != 13 || openPopup(this.href, 'popup', 1010, 700, 'status=0, resizable=0');return false;' onclick='openPopup(this.href, 'popup', 1010, 700, 'status=0, resizable=0');return false;'&gt;&lt;img border='0' src='http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/lieberman_mc.jpg' alt='' 
&lt;div class='headline'&gt;'http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=8951720' onkeydown='return event.keyCode != 13 || openPopup(this.href, 'popup', 1010, 700, 'status=0, resizable=0');return false;' onclick='openPopup(this.href, 'popup', 1010, 700, 'status=0, resizable=0');return false;'&gt; &lt;span class='content-label'&gt;WATCH:  Subway Series: Sen. Lieberman on Health Care Bill&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

Nelson's vote is critical to getting a bill passed because &lt;a target='external' href='http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/public-option-resurrected-health-care-reform-forging-ahead/story?id=8913206'&gt;Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid needs 60 votes before the Senate can even begin debating the bill.  With all 40 Republicans currently opposed to it, Reid needs the votes of all 60 Democrats.


There is one thing about the House bill, however, that Nelson does like: &lt;a target='external' href='http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/abortion-amendment-health-care-bills-ignites-debate-womens/story?id=9034995'&gt;the strict ban on any abortion coverage by insurance plans bought with government subsidies. Unless the Senate bill includes a similar provision, Nelson said, he'll vote against it.

&lt;div class='story-embed-left box'&gt;
 
 
&lt;/div&gt;

'Federal taxpayer money ought not to be used to fund abortions,' Nelson said. 'So whether it is subsidies on premiums or whether it is tax credits or whatever it is...it should not be used to fund abortions.' Nelson also talked about the message he heard from former President Bill Clinton, who talked to Senate Democrats at their weekly closed-door luncheon.


'What I heard him say is that you don't have to let the desire for perfection get in the way of the good,' Nelson said. 'And that makes a great deal of sense. But I would add the caveat that we have to be sure it is not a bad bill, that it doesn't add to the deficit, that it doesn't increase taxes, and that does, in fact, control the growth in costs.'
</description><slash:comments>0</slash:comments></item><item><title>No Meat For You </title><pubDate>2009-10-29T15:58:38Z</pubDate><author>RBriggs</author><link>/Forums/tabid/643/forumid/35/threadid/137/scope/posts/Default.aspx</link><description>
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=510572





&lt;font size='4'&gt;No Meat For You&lt;/font&gt;





Posted 10/28/2009 06:25 PM ET





The Environment: Britain's climate chief says humans should give up eating meat to protect the planet from global warming. The alarmists keep making it hard for anyone to take them seriously.





According to Lord Nicholas Stern, 'Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases. It puts enormous pressure on the world's resources.'





Though not a strict vegetarian himself, his lordship has decided that 'a vegetarian diet is better.'





Sometimes it seems there's no end to the loopy solutions that are issued as serious proposals to 'fight' global warming.





We can't eat meat (unless the meal was once one of our pets) or use standard incandescent light bulbs. We have to use rough toilet paper. Our showers have to be shorter, our children fewer, our commutes briefer and bike rides longer. We should flush less, buy carbon offsets and build more windmills (except where view sheds of the beach-dwelling rich and famous would be compromised).


&amp;#160;


&lt;img src='http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/gm09102020091020034829.jpg' alt='' 


&amp;#160;


Stern's go-meatless comments made headlines, of course, but his more telling comments have not gotten the attention they should. Whether intentional or not, he exposed the real cause that drives the left to perpetuate the global warming scare.





The London Times reported Tuesday that Stern, the Baron of Brentford, is 'deeply concerned that popular opinion had so far failed to grasp the scale of the changes needed to address climate change, or of the importance of the (United Nations) meeting in Copenhagen from Dec. 7 to Dec. 18.'





'I am not sure that people fully understand what we are talking about or the kind of changes that will be necessary,' he said.





The key word is 'changes.' 'Change' is what warm-mongers are all about. They want to force us to radically change the way we live, and the environment is merely a vehicle through which they are trying to establish their version of utopia — an egalitarian society in which, as Orwell noted, 'some are more equal than others.'





By terrifying the public over climate change, the left hopes to rid the developed world of objects it finds offensive: comfortable houses, larger cars, unfettered travel, hearty meals, any conspicuous symbol of prosperity. In the left's handbook, if everyone can't have the biggest and the best, no one should — no one, that is, except for the elitists who'll make the rules.





Those elitists will meet in Denmark in December in hopes of writing a new international agreement to cut CO2 emissions.





If they want the world to take them seriously, they should arrive by bicycle, on horseback and in rowboats, work by candlelight, shiver in the cold and eat nothing but salads. But they won't, and that's another telling sign that the global warming threat is a con.
</description><slash:comments>0</slash:comments></item><item><title>Obama offers millions in Muslim technology fund</title><pubDate>2009-10-25T03:34:11Z</pubDate><author>Lunger</author><link>/Forums/tabid/643/forumid/35/threadid/104/scope/posts/Default.aspx</link><description>
'http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.211 show_article=1'&gt;www.breitbart.com/article.php


&lt;img width='271' height='323' alt='' src='http://www.theodoresworld.net/pics/0208/MuslimObamaImage2.jpg' 


&lt;span class='lingo_region'&gt;The White House Friday highlighted a new multi-million-dollar technology fund for Muslim nations, following a pledge made by President Barack Obama in his landmark speech to the Islamic world.

The White House said the US Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) had issued a call for proposals for the fund, which will provide financing of between 25 and 150 million dollars for selected projects and funds.


The Global Technology and Innovation Fund will 'catalyze and facilitate private sector investments' throughout Asia, the Middle East and Africa, the White House said in a statement.


Eligible projects would advance economic opportunity and create jobs in areas like technology, education, telecoms, media, business services and clean technology, the White House said.


OPIC said sample projects could help foster the development of new computer technology or telecommunications businesses, or widen access to broadband Internet services.


Proposals must be submitted by the end of November, and managers of funds that make a final short list will make presentations in Washington in January.


Final selections will be announced next June.


In his speech to the Muslim world in Cairo last June, Obama argued that 'education and innovation will be the currency of the 21st century' and that under-investment was rife in many Muslim nations.


As well as the fund, Obama also said he will host a summit on entrepreneurship this year to deepen ties between business leaders in the United States and Muslim communities around the world.


In his speech on June 4, Obama vowed to forge a 'new beginning' for Islam and America, promising to purge years of 'suspicion and discord.'


In what may be one of the defining moments of his presidency, Obama laid out a new blueprint for US Middle East policy, pledged to end mistrust, forge a state for Palestinians and defuse a nuclear showdown with Iran.


&amp;#160;


</description><slash:comments>0</slash:comments></item></channel></rss>